Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 8 de 8
Filtrar
1.
PLoS One ; 18(3): e0282972, 2023.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36930611

RESUMO

Hepatitis A virus can cause severe and prolonged illness in persons with HIV (PWH). In July 2020, the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) expanded its recommendation for hepatitis A vaccination to include all PWH aged ≥1 year. We used a decision analytic model to estimate the value of vaccinating a cohort of adult PWH aged ≥20 years with diagnosed HIV in the United States using a limited societal perspective. The model compared 3 scenarios over an analytic horizon of 1 year: no vaccination, current vaccine coverage, and full vaccination. We incorporated the direct medical costs and nonmedical costs (i.e., public health costs and productivity loss). We estimated the total number of infections averted, cost to vaccinate, and incremental cost per case averted. Full implementation of the ACIP recommendation resulted in 775 to 812 fewer adult cases of hepatitis A in 1 year compared with the observed vaccination coverage. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio for the full vaccination scenario was $48,000 for the 2-dose single-antigen hepatitis A vaccine and $130,000 for the 3-dose combination hepatitis A and hepatitis B vaccine per case averted, compared with the observed vaccination scenario. Depending on type of vaccine, full hepatitis A vaccination of PWH could lead to ≥80% reduction in the number of cases and $48,000 to $130,000 in additional cost per case averted. Data on hepatitis A health outcomes and costs specific to PWH are needed to better understand the longer-term costs and benefits of the 2020 ACIP recommendation.


Assuntos
Infecções por HIV , Hepatite A , Adulto , Humanos , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia , Análise Custo-Benefício , Hepatite A/prevenção & controle , Vacinação , Vacinas contra Hepatite A , Infecções por HIV/complicações
2.
Am J Trop Med Hyg ; 101(4): 891-898, 2019 10.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31392947

RESUMO

São Tomé and Príncipe (STP) uses a selective hepatitis B birth-dose vaccination (HepB-BD) strategy targeting infants born to mothers who test positive for hepatitis B virus (HBV) surface antigen. We conducted a field assessment and economic analysis of the HepB-BD strategy to provide evidence to guide development of cost-effective policies to prevent perinatal HBV transmission in STP. We interviewed national stakeholders and key informants to understand policies, knowledge, and practices related to HepB-BD, vaccine management, and data recording/reporting. Cost-effectiveness of the existing strategy was compared with an alternate approach of universal HepB-BD to all newborns using a decision analytic model. Incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) were calculated in 2015 USD per HBV-associated death and per chronic HBV case prevented, from the STP health-care system perspective. We found that STP lacked national or facility-specific written policies and procedures related to HepB-BD. Timely HepB-BD to eligible newborns was considered a high priority, although timeliness of HepB-BD was not monitored. Compared with the existing selective vaccination strategy, universal HepB-BD would result in a 19% decrease in chronic HBV infections per year at overall cost savings of approximately 44% (savings of USD 5,441 each year). We estimate an ICER of USD 5,012 saved per HBV-associated death averted. The existing selective HepB-BD strategy in STP could be improved through documentation of policies, procedures, and timeliness of HepB-BD. Expansion to universal newborn HepB-BD without maternal screening is feasible and could result in cost savings if actual implementation costs and effectiveness fall within the ranges modeled.


Assuntos
Antígenos de Superfície da Hepatite B/imunologia , Vacinas contra Hepatite B/administração & dosagem , Hepatite B Crônica/prevenção & controle , Hepatite B/prevenção & controle , Programas de Imunização/economia , Transmissão Vertical de Doenças Infecciosas/prevenção & controle , Vacinação , Análise Custo-Benefício , Medicina Baseada em Evidências , Feminino , Hepatite B/virologia , Hepatite B Crônica/virologia , Humanos , Recém-Nascido , Parto , Gravidez , Avaliação de Programas e Projetos de Saúde , São Tomé e Príncipe , Organização Mundial da Saúde
3.
PLoS One ; 12(8): e0183391, 2017.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28837594

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Vaccination is the best measure to prevent influenza. We conducted a cost-effectiveness evaluation of trivalent inactivated seasonal influenza vaccination, compared to no vaccination, in children ≤60 months of age participating in a prospective cohort study in Bangkok, Thailand. METHODS: A static decision tree model was constructed to simulate the population of children in the cohort. Proportions of children with laboratory-confirmed influenza were derived from children followed weekly. The societal perspective and one-year analytic horizon were used for each influenza season; the model was repeated for three influenza seasons (2012-2014). Direct and indirect costs associated with influenza illness were collected and summed. Cost of the trivalent inactivated seasonal influenza vaccine (IIV3) including promotion, administration, and supervision cost was added for children who were vaccinated. Quality-adjusted life years (QALY), derived from literature, were used to quantify health outcomes. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) was calculated as the difference in the expected total costs between the vaccinated and unvaccinated groups divided by the difference in QALYs for both groups. RESULTS: Compared to no vaccination, IIV3 vaccination among children ≤60 months in our cohort was not cost-effective in the introductory year (2012 season; 24,450 USD/QALY gained), highly cost-effective in the 2013 season (554 USD/QALY gained), and cost-effective in the 2014 season (16,200 USD/QALY gained). CONCLUSION: The cost-effectiveness of IIV3 vaccination among children participating in the cohort study varied by influenza season, with vaccine cost and proportion of high-risk children demonstrating the greatest influence in sensitivity analyses. Vaccinating children against influenza can be economically favorable depending on the maturity of the program, influenza vaccine performance, and target population.


Assuntos
Análise Custo-Benefício , Vacinas contra Influenza/economia , Estações do Ano , Pré-Escolar , Estudos de Coortes , Técnicas de Apoio para a Decisão , Humanos , Lactente , Vacinas contra Influenza/administração & dosagem , Estudos Prospectivos , Anos de Vida Ajustados por Qualidade de Vida , Tailândia
4.
Bull World Health Organ ; 92(3): 162-70, 2014 Mar 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24700975

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To estimate the incremental cost over 5 years of a policy switch from the Option B to the Option B+ protocol for the prevention of mother-to-child transmission (PMTCT) of the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV). METHODS: Data from cost studies and other published sources were used to determine the cost, per woman and per cohort (1000 breastfeeding and 1000 non-breastfeeding women), of switching from Option B (maternal triple antiretroviral [ARV] regimen during pregnancy and breastfeeding plus daily nevirapine for the infant for 6 weeks) to Option B+ (maternal triple ARV regimen initiated during pregnancy and continued for life). The variables used to model the different scenarios were maternal CD4+ T lymphocyte (CD4+ cell) count (350-500 versus > 500 cells/µl), rate of decline in CD4+ cells (average, rapid, slow), breastfeeding status (yes, no) and breastfeeding duration (12, 18 or 24 months). FINDINGS: For women with CD4+ cell counts of 350-500 cells/µl, the incremental cost per 1000 women was 157,345 United States dollars (US$) for breastfeeding women and US$ 92,813 for non-breastfeeding women. For women with CD4+ cell counts > 500 cells/µl, the incremental cost per 1000 women ranged from US$ 363,443 to US$ 484,591 for breastfeeding women and was US$ 605,739 for non-breastfeeding women. CONCLUSION: From a cost perspective, a policy switch from Option B to Option B+ is feasible in PMTCT programme settings where resources are currently being allocated to Option B.


Assuntos
Antirretrovirais/economia , Infecções por HIV/tratamento farmacológico , Infecções por HIV/economia , Transmissão Vertical de Doenças Infecciosas/economia , Transmissão Vertical de Doenças Infecciosas/prevenção & controle , Fármacos Anti-HIV , Antirretrovirais/uso terapêutico , Aleitamento Materno , Contagem de Linfócito CD4 , Estudos de Coortes , Análise Custo-Benefício , Feminino , Infecções por HIV/sangue , Infecções por HIV/prevenção & controle , Infecções por HIV/transmissão , Humanos , Nevirapina/economia , Nevirapina/uso terapêutico , Gravidez , Nações Unidas , Estados Unidos
6.
AIDS Behav ; 17(9): 3081-90, 2013 Nov.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23963498

RESUMO

We present a comparison of respondent-driven sampling (RDS) and time-location sampling (TLS) for behavioral surveillance studies among men who have sex with men (MSM). In 2010, we conducted two simultaneous studies using TLS (N = 609) and RDS (N = 507) in Guatemala city. Differences in characteristics of the population reached based on weighted estimates as well as the time and cost of recruitment are presented. RDS MSM were marginally more likely to self-report as heterosexual, less likely to disclose sexual orientation to family members and more likely to report sex with women than TLS MSM. Although RDS MSM were less likely than TLS MSM to report ≥2 non-commercial male partners, they were more likely to report selling sex in the past 12 months. The cost per participant was $89 and $121 for RDS and TLS, respectively. Our results suggest that RDS reached a more hidden sub-population of non-gay-identifying MSM than TLS and had a lower implementation cost.


Assuntos
Coleta de Dados/métodos , Infecções por HIV/prevenção & controle , Homossexualidade Masculina , Comportamento Sexual , Adulto , Análise Custo-Benefício , Estudos Transversais , Guatemala/epidemiologia , Infecções por HIV/epidemiologia , Acesso aos Serviços de Saúde , Humanos , Masculino , Assunção de Riscos , Amostragem , Autorrelato , Fatores de Tempo
7.
J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr ; 60(1): e8-e14, 2012 May 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22240461

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: In sub-Saharan Africa, high mortality rates have been reported among patients with advanced HIV infection initiating antiretroviral therapy (ART). We evaluated the cost-effectiveness of expanding access to cotrimoxazole (CTX) for persons with HIV in averting mortality during the first 6 months of ART. We also evaluated possible cost savings related to prevention of specific opportunistic infections (OIs). METHODS: We developed a decision-analytic model to estimate the incremental cost, deaths averted, and incremental cost-effectiveness ratio. The model compared 2 scenarios for providing CTX and evaluated potential benefits of increased CTX coverage in reducing deaths and cases of OI. The base case scenario represents an estimated current level of CTX coverage among adults initiating ART in low-income countries (65%). The comparator is 97% coverage (excluding only those with contraindications to CTX). We conducted sensitivity analyses on all parameters in the model. RESULTS: Full coverage reduced deaths from 94 to 72 per 1000 patients, averting 22 deaths during the first 6 months of ART compared with the base case. The incremental cost of moving from base case to full coverage was estimated at $3.29 per person on ART and $146.91 per death averted over 6 months. Additional benefits from averted OI cases would likely be realized as well as savings from averted OI treatment costs. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest that expanding CTX coverage is a cost-effective approach to reducing mortality among patients who present with advanced HIV and initiate ART. The expansion of coverage may also yield benefits for OIs.


Assuntos
Infecções Oportunistas Relacionadas com a AIDS/prevenção & controle , Fármacos Anti-HIV/administração & dosagem , Anti-Infecciosos/economia , Antibioticoprofilaxia/economia , Terapia Antirretroviral de Alta Atividade , Infecções por HIV/tratamento farmacológico , Combinação Trimetoprima e Sulfametoxazol/economia , Infecções Oportunistas Relacionadas com a AIDS/mortalidade , Adulto , África Subsaariana , Anti-Infecciosos/administração & dosagem , Antibioticoprofilaxia/métodos , Análise Custo-Benefício , Infecções por HIV/complicações , Humanos , Modelos Estatísticos , Combinação Trimetoprima e Sulfametoxazol/administração & dosagem
8.
J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr ; 60(1): e1-7, 2012 May 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22240465

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: In sub-Saharan Africa, patients with advanced HIV experience high mortality during the first few months of antiretroviral therapy (ART), largely attributable to tuberculosis (TB). We evaluated the cost-effectiveness of TB diagnostic strategies to reduce this early mortality. METHODS: We developed a decision analytic model to estimate the incremental cost, deaths averted, and cost-effectiveness of 3 TB diagnostic algorithms. The model base case represents current practice (symptoms screening, sputum smear, and chest radiography) in many resource-limited countries in sub-Saharan Africa. We compared the current practice with World Health Organization (WHO)-recommended practice with culture and WHO-recommended practice with the Xpert mycobacterium tuberculosis and resistance to rifampicin test and considered relevant medical costs from a health system perspective using the timeframe of the first 6 months of ART. We conducted univariate and probabilistic sensitivity analyses on all parameters in the model. RESULTS: When considering TB diagnosis and treatment and ART costs, the cost per patient was $850 for current practice, $809 for the algorithm with Xpert test, and $879 for the algorithm with culture. Our results showed that both WHO-recommended algorithms avert more deaths among TB cases than does the current practice. The algorithm with Xpert test was least costly at reducing early mortality compared with the current practice. Sensitivity analyses indicated that cost-effectiveness findings were stable. CONCLUSIONS: Our analysis showed that culture or Xpert were cost-effective at reducing early mortality during the first 6 months of ART compared with the current practice. Thus, our findings provide support for ongoing efforts to expand TB diagnostic capacity.


Assuntos
Fármacos Anti-HIV/administração & dosagem , Terapia Antirretroviral de Alta Atividade , Técnicas de Laboratório Clínico/economia , Técnicas de Laboratório Clínico/métodos , Infecções por HIV/complicações , Mycobacterium tuberculosis/isolamento & purificação , Tuberculose/diagnóstico , África Subsaariana , Antituberculosos/farmacologia , Análise Custo-Benefício , Infecções por HIV/tratamento farmacológico , Infecções por HIV/mortalidade , Humanos , Testes de Sensibilidade Microbiana , Modelos Estatísticos , Mycobacterium tuberculosis/efeitos dos fármacos , Rifampina/farmacologia , Análise de Sobrevida , Tuberculose/mortalidade
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...